Page 2 of 3

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Mon 30 Dec, 2013 12:38 pm
by dkong
Who are voting no?

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Mon 30 Dec, 2013 7:26 pm
by Loki
One "NO" vote is from me and I've explained HERE why I'm voted with "NO".

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Mon 30 Dec, 2013 7:59 pm
by FlakVader
Please do state why you are voting no (not only loki). I am personally very interested about the reasons.

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Tue 31 Dec, 2013 1:35 am
by *ELAN_ONE*
He seems to improve himself in regards to the "Statistic-illness" ;) so give him a "T" shall be ok for me. On top of that he seems to be the same age like our Flocke ;) and they seem to come along quite good too....so as long as he stays as calm as he was the last times I heard him again the "T" shall be ok for the time being and also a fair and friendly step to his improvements.....my 2 cent

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Tue 31 Dec, 2013 8:31 pm
by FlakVader
@Elan ... he is actually 3 years older. You don't even remember letting the 14 year old join the clan do you? ;)

However, I think we can agree that age isn't always an indicator for maturity *cough* burning *cough* 8-)

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Wed 01 Jan, 2014 7:22 pm
by *ELAN_ONE*
FlakVader wrote:@Elan ... he is actually 3 years older. You don't even remember letting the 14 year old join the clan do you? ;)

grrrr......OF COURSE I can ....oh gosh you dont know me :o :) .....i never forget ;) bro just did not wanted to hype it as you did it now ;) ....but i agree on the "age" sentence!!! (but without the "burning touch" and more to the core of it ;) :D )

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Wed 01 Jan, 2014 8:12 pm
by Nodbrother
Since I am not playing anymore (for now, you enver know what happens) I am not going to vote Y or N, but I have one thing to say about this matter:

It is only a frigging "T", guys. And that is not something that automatically means the player will become Full Member.
We have had many "T"'s before that did not fit the bill......

Maybe I should not even say anything about it, but what the hell: I just did :D

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Wed 01 Jan, 2014 9:16 pm
by *ELAN_ONE*
Nodbrother wrote:Since I am not playing anymore (for now, you enver know what happens) I am not going to vote Y or N, but I have one thing to say about this matter:

It is only a frigging "T", guys. And that is not something that automatically means the player will become Full Member.
We have had many "T"'s before that did not fit the bill......

Maybe I should not even say anything about it, but what the hell: I just did :D



my thought so that why the "T" is absolutely ok!

and good to hear from you Noddie! and hope to c you back someday...BF4 is amazing and we do have so many nice maps...like vietnam even...u know back in the days!!! we even have NODDIE HILL BACK (no joking!) 8-) :D

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Thu 02 Jan, 2014 4:02 am
by EBassie
Ow... forgot to mention: I voted "yes for T"

see below.

Re: Join Us Request 77: 3Tactical

PostPosted: Wed 05 Feb, 2014 10:02 pm
by EBassie
I the light of current affairs we, as a clan and a group of friends, decided you don't really fit our clan.

Unfortunately you violated one of our key rules.

ยง2. Social Aspect
We put great value in a respectful way we play with each other. He or she who does not wish to do so, must sadly go.


Case closed.